|
CONTENTS
|
Power Factor Correction
Electrical Troubleshooting Quiz
Planning Plant Maintenance Repairs
NEC at the Facility
Bonding vs. Grounding
It's Time to Hit the Beach
Answer to Electrical Troubleshooting Quiz
|
|
About This Newsletter
|
This twice-a-month e-newsletter is brought to you from the
publisher of EC&M magazine. MRO Insider addresses topics such
as:
Working with management and supervision
National Electrical Code® on the production floor
Safety procedures and programs
Troubleshooting techniques
Equipment maintenance and testing tips
Managing motors and generators
Trends in training and education
Managing energy use
|
Subscriptions
|
|
To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe
To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe
To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML),
or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile
page to change your delivery preferences.
|
Back Issues
|
|
Missed an
issue? Visit the MRO
Insider archive page on the EC&M Web site.
|
Share with a Friend
|
|
Do you know
someone who’d like to receive his or her own copy of MRO Insider? Visit
the subscriber site enter their e-mail address, and spread the wealth.
Subscribe
|
Advertising
|
To find out
how to advertise in this newsletter, e-mail David Miller or call him at
(312) 840-8497.
The designations "National Electrical Code” and “NEC” refer to the
National Electrical Code®, which is a registered trademark of the
National Fire Protection Association.
ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

|
| | | | |
|
Maintenance
Power Factor Correction
If your facility has power factor (PF) correction
capacitors
at its service entrance, those capacitors are probably there to prevent
a utility penalty. What they don't do is improve power factor at the
load, which means your actual energy consumption is higher than it
needs
to be. This, of course, means your company pays for electricity it
doesn't use.
Have you been unable to get approval to pay for a site power survey
to see where your energy losses are? Try shrinking the scope. Start
with
a one-line diagram of your distribution system, and limit the survey so
it goes no further than the major loads. If you identify energy savings
with this limited survey, the money you save can help you justify a
more
detailed follow-up survey.
Even with PF correction at the service entrance, you may be
surprised
to find that you have unacceptably low PF at some loads. But don't just
go slapping PF correction capacitors on your large motors, if they have
variable-frequency drives. Consult the drive manufacturer for
recommendations.
Before implementing any load-level PF correction, determine the
effects on your entire distribution system. Corrections at the load
will
change the PF capacitor size you need at the service.
Make sure you regularly inspect PF correction capacitors. Power events
can damage these capacitors -- and that damage may not be readily
apparent. If you can't remove individual capacitors for testing or
replacement because the lid of your PF unit interferes with this,
consider replacing that unit with one that has a maintenance-friendly
lid design.
ADVERTISEMENT
Affordable Power Protection from
AutomationDirect
600 VAC/250 VDC heavy-duty fusible
and non-fusible disconnects from Ferraz Shawmut are UL, CSA, CE,
and
IEC rated. Assorted handles meet OSHA padlocking, defeater options, and
NEMA and NFPA 79 requirements. SIRCO switches, 30-800 amp ratings,
start
at $57. FUSERBLOC fusible disconnects, up to 200 amps, start at $85.
Visit www.AutomationDirect.com or
call 800-633-0405.
Repair
Electrical Troubleshooting Quiz
The breakers supplying large loads have been tripping
on
overcurrent. You used the recording feature of your DMM and verified
the
high current levels, yet voltage is normal. The problem is so
widespread
that you doubt it's due to problems with any individual load. What is a
likely cause?
The answer to this question appears at the end of this
newsletter.
Planning Plant Maintenance
Repairs
How is this for embarrassing? You arrange for a
two-hour
shutdown to replace a nuisance breaker that supplies a main feeder
circuit. After closing the breaker and restarting production,
everything
works fine on that feeder. But another breaker in that same panel now
won't reclose.
All kinds of similar situations have made sharp maintenance people
look like chumps. Why does this happen?
We've all been taught, "If it works, don't fix it." We have a
tendency to limit the scope of a repair to the item that caused us to
fight for every hour of downtime to make the repair. This doesn't
always
work in our favor.
If you need to replace a breaker in Panel A, it usually does not
make
sense to start tearing into Panel B also. But if you have to shut down
Panel A to replace a breaker, logic dictates that Panel A may have
other
problems. The cost and hassle of multiple shutdowns is far greater than
just extending the Panel A shutdown for a complete checkup and
preventive maintenance.
But you can take "full maintenance" too far. Trying to cram every
conceivable test and task into a limited time slot by piling people and
equipment into a limited space is asking for trouble. Instead, take
these steps:
- Assess your time constraints. If the shutdown is occurring
on
systems that don't run 24x7, timing the shutdown to coincide with
normal
downtime or even shift changes may give you a larger window. Consider
also any outages that are already scheduled.
- Assess the maximum crew size. This is a critical step many
planners
overlook. There is only so much space in a given work area, and you
can't have people working on top of each other.
- Assess what is most critical. Yes, it would be nice to check
off
the
box that you cleaned the cabinets. But breaker testing may be a more
productive use of what little time and space you have.
- Consider the next downtime window. This is a subset of the
previous
step. Assuming any repairs will need another downtime window, what
tests
can and should you perform to identify problems to fix then? Factor in
any lead times for ordering parts.
Operation
NEC at the Facility
An example of where the language of the NEC creates
confusion between grounding and bonding is 314.4: "All metal boxes
shall
be grounded with the provisions of Article 250." The NEC does not
require you to ground metal boxes -- it requires you to bond them. When
you dig into the Article 250 provisions, this becomes apparent. It's
just not obvious from the wording in 314.4.
Bonding vs. Grounding
Article 100 of the NEC clearly defines grounding
(earthing) and bonding (metallic connection). Yet, the NEC frequently
uses "grounding" where it actually means "bonding." Unfortunately, OSHA
follows this same misuse of terminology. How can you know when to bond
rather then ground?
Keep in mind that, because the earth is a high-resistance path,
grounding does not eliminate differences of potential. Any time the
goal
is to prevent shock or flashover, grounding isn't going to help you. To
achieve those goals, you must bond.
One trick experts use is to draw the circuit on paper and apply
Ohm's
Law. Because voltage is current times resistance, the low resistance
you
get from bonding will result in a far lower voltage than the high
resistance you get from grounding.
But what if your drawing ends up being a parallel circuit? Simply
apply Kirchoff's Law. In essence, it says that electricity will flow in
inverse proportion to the paths presented to it. To shunt more
undesired
current, bond to get that lower resistance path in parallel with the
equipment or people you are trying to protect.
Show & Events
It's Time to Hit the Beach
If it's your job to make sure all systems are "go," you
need to go to Electric West. This show and conference offers the right
information and product mix to meet all of your information needs. Do
you maintain and operate electrical systems in a facility? If so, you
have to make plans to attend the Electric West conference program in
Long Beach, Calif. Check
out this event's 40+ seminars in the areas of power quality,
safety,
Code changes, and industrial applications, and make plans to meet 200+
leading suppliers. Or register
now.
Quiz Answers
Answer to Electrical
Troubleshooting
Quiz
The fact the loads are all drawing too much current is
a
classic sign of low power factor, although high harmonics may be the
culprit. You need more information before changing anything. Use a
power
analyzer to determine the actual power factor and harmonics level on
each feeder and at the service. If the problem is recent and seems to
have occurred all on its own, suspect failed PF correction capacitors.
|
You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#
For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact
our
Customer Service Department at:
Customer Service Department EC&M
A Prism Business Media publication
US Toll Free: 866-505-7173
International: 847-763-9504
Email:ecmweb@pbinews.com
Prism Business Media
9800 Metcalf Avenue
Overland Park, KS 66212
Copyright 2006, Prism Business Media. All rights reserved. This article
is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property
laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed,
re-disseminated,
transmitted,
displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any
medium
without the prior written permission of Prism Business Media.
|
|