View this email as a Web page Please add MRO Insider to your Safe Sender list.

February 26, 2007 A Prism Business Media Publication Vol. III No. 4


CONTENTS
Procedure Reconciliation, Part One

Electrical Troubleshooting Quiz

Repair Scripts: The Checklist

NEC at the Facility

Unsafe Assumptions

Visit the EC&M E-Tradeshow and Learn About Claim Litigation

Answer to Electrical Troubleshooting Quiz


About This Newsletter
This twice-a-month
e-newsletter is brought to you from the publisher of EC&M magazine.

MRO Insider addresses topics such as:

  • Working with management and supervision
  • National Electrical Code® on the production floor
  • Safety procedures and programs
  • Troubleshooting techniques
  • Equipment maintenance and testing tips
  • Managing motors and generators
  • Trends in training and education
  • Managing energy use


  • Subscriptions
    To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe

    To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe

    To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML), or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile page to change your delivery preferences.


    Back Issues
    Missed an issue? Visit the MRO Insider archive page on the EC&M Web site.

    Share with a Friend
    Do you know someone who’d like to receive his or her own copy of MRO Insider? Visit the subscriber site enter their e-mail address, and spread the wealth. Subscribe


    Advertising
    To find out how to advertise in this newsletter, e-mail David Miller or call him at (312-840-8487.

    The designations "National Electrical Code” and “NEC” refer to the National Electrical Code®, which is a registered trademark of the National Fire Protection Association.

     
    ADVERTISEMENT



    ADVERTISEMENT



    Maintenance
    Procedure Reconciliation, Part One
    One seldom tapped use for a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) is procedure reconciliation. The CMMS is useful for this task in two ways. We'll cover the second way in Part Two (the March 12 issue). The first way involves comparing maintenance procedures contained within the CMMS.

    Your CMMS probably contains maintenance procedures for individual pieces of equipment. And you probably have quite a bit of identical equipment with not-so-identical maintenance procedures. You may, for example, have Model X motor made by Mfr Y in 16 different locations, and thus 16 separately written maintenance procedures for the same motor.

    Inconsistency is never a good thing, especially in maintenance. First, it is unlikely each variation is technically correct and so suboptimal maintenance is built into your system. Second, variations undermine the validity of the procedures and thus promote noncompliance.

    One way to end procedural variations is to create a procedure library. This is a central depot (preferably in a network folder) that contains each procedure as a separate file/document. With maintenance procedures no longer embedded in varied forms in multiple locations, many quality issues in your maintenance program disappear. And when you reconcile the variations into one document, you (theoretically) have the best features of all the variations.

    Don't create long, meaning-laden names for your procedures. This mistake is called "attribute overloading." Give each procedure a short, unique name. For example: Motor001, Motor002, and Motor003. A short general text name (e.g., motor) makes things more intuitive. For specificity, append a number to it, as in the examples. But keep it simple. You can't get much simpler than "003."



    ADVERTISEMENT
    Do-more with C-more™!
    AutomationDirect's C-more™ touch panels, in 6, 8, 10, 12 or 15-inch versions, virtually replace mechanical pushbuttons, switches, meters, and other peripheral devices. C-more™ touch screen monitors provide the best combination of reliability, ease of use, and features at the lowest possible prices. View the complete C-more™ line.


    Repair
    Electrical Troubleshooting Quiz
    A critical piece of equipment has gone down due to failure of the drive motor three times in the past year. Each time, production supervisors have insisted that even one second more of downtime is too much. They want a new motor installed, pronto. How can you troubleshoot the motor, if they won't extend the downtime?

    The answer to this question appears at the end of this newsletter.


    Repair Scripts: The Checklist
    When machinery goes down, what is the priority? Getting that machinery back up, of course. Unfortunately, the pressure to end downtime often leads to incomplete troubleshooting and insufficient repair.

    For example, a motor stops running. Using your advanced knowledge of motors, you determine that the large cloud of smoke curling up from the windings indicates there might be a problem with the motor. You replace the motor, and production is once more humming along. You wanted to figure out what toasted that motor, but there just wasn't time to do that. Or was there?

    Using a standardized checklist developed for each specific piece of production equipment, you can usually identify the root cause of a failure -- and quickly. By doing your thinking, researching, and planning when the equipment is up, you don't have to do those things during the pressure-cooker of downtime.

    If you haven't created checklists before, you probably should ease into doing so. Start with the equipment that can least tolerate downtime. Read the manufacturer's literature, walk down the system drawings, look through the PLC programming, and so forth. Make a short list of potential failures and what to check to see of those exist. Stop as soon as you have a decent-sized list, so this task doesn't overwhelm you. As new problems are identified, just update your checklist. It isn't necessary to determine every possible cause when you first develop the list.

    A good checklist will be divided up into short user-friendly sections, such as these:

    • Quick checks
    • Supply measurements
    • Load inspections
    • Top potential failure causes
    • Programming checks

    As you build each checklist, keep in mind you are trying to do the most useful checks in a limited window of downtime. You may not catch the root cause with your checklist, and the downtime will occur again for the same reason as last time. But at least it won't be for something obvious like voltage imbalance on the supply to a motor.


    Operation
    NEC at the Facility
    How can any facility exist without flexible cords? We see them everywhere. We count on them to safely provide power in a wide variety of conditions and for a wide variety of purposes. The phrase "flexible cords" includes those portable power cords you depend on, but goes beyond them as well. Flexible cords fall under Article 400. When is the last time you reviewed those requirements against your cord inventory and usage?


    Unsafe Assumptions
    In our previous edition, we pointed out that most industrial accidents occur because of what people do. That is, unsafe acts cause accidents and injuries. But where do unsafe acts come from? One source is incorrect assumptions, such as these:

    • "Warming up in the switchgear room is better than freezing out here." Nobody says getting frostbite is good. But entering a switchgear room when you don't have to, especially if you aren't wearing the appropriate arc blast protection, is foolish.
    • "If there's a ground fault, the overcurrent device will protect me." During a low-grade fault, an OCPD can hold long past the time you become charcoal. It won't protect you.
    • "If I'm walking to my work area, safety glasses aren't necessary because I'm not actually working yet." The purpose of wearing safety glasses has nothing to do whether you are working. It has to do with what dangers may be present. Studies have shown that standard safety glasses outperform the best excuses, every time.


    Show & Events

    Visit the EC&M E-Tradeshow and Learn About Claim Litigation
    Don't miss the live conference Claim Litigation: Bolstering Your Case presented by John DeDad, senior director, editorial and EC&M development, scheduled for March 15th. Learn how to retrieve costs resulting from undesirable and/or unplanned working conditions that are beyond your control. Find out how to document various claim categories such as acceleration and resulting decreased productivity, additional engineering costs for change-order work, additional financing expenses, and joint occupancy with other work forces. Visit http://ecmweb.com/etradeshow for information on accessing the EC&M e-Tradeshow, a virtual online exhibition and live conference center.


    Quiz Answers
    Answer to Electrical Troubleshooting Quiz Every motor replacement involves downtime. The trick to getting "troubleshooting downtime" is to realize that troubleshooting isn't necessarily sequential to replacement. These tasks can, and often should, be done simultaneously.

    Develop a troubleshooting script. If you can base this on post-mortems of the other drive motors that failed, that's ideal. Have one team troubleshoot while another team does the remove/replace drill. If production management balks at the cost of two teams instead of one, then that motor probably isn't so critical after all.


    You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#

    For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at:
    Customer Service Department
    EC&M
    A Prism Business Media publication
    US Toll Free: 866-505-7173
    International: 847-763-9504
    Email:ecmweb@pbinews.com

    Prism Business Media
    9800 Metcalf Avenue
    Overland Park, KS 66212

    Copyright 2006, Prism Business Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Prism Business Media.